But since the latter is intended/recommended for such low-light conditions, would that (1600+) be too sensitive to use in daylight? Shooting ISO 800 on the BMCC is the same as setting the camera to 200 and underexposing 2 EV, then boosting the two stops in post. Portra 800 Color Negative Film ISO 800, 35mm Size, 36 Exposure, Top Rated Gear: KODAK Portra 800 Color Negative Film ISO 800, 35mm Size, 36 Exposure, MFR: 1451855. . Heres what I reckon now; thinking about a chat I had with a guy who runs a local lab along the lines of Ah people shouldnt make such a fuss about films, we can pull pretty much anything we want off a neg; its more about how the scanners are set up etc and I dont really agree I do think people make too much fuss about film, but its OK to make SOME fuss FWIW heres what re-reading this made me think. Its shots like this that make me wonder why some people are so obsessed with pushing film these days. An old 500mm lens requires 1/500s or shorter to make that work. Whether it be underexposing the film a bit, or popping a filter on the lens to support, check out our tips for shooting Cinestill 800T in daylight. My first go has been with Lomo 800 (which I think might be Kodak of some variety) which I have so far enjoyed very much. One of the things that hasn't been mentioned yet is why you select a particular film. It's only one stop slower than ISO 800, and two stops faster than ISO 100. The image above demonstrates the best-case scenario: I had a reference frame shot with an 85C warming filter right next to the working (no filter) scene. Human vision can recognize a sheet of paper as white regardless of the colour of light that falls on it. Film is much more finicky with under exposure. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_14',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-mobile-leaderboard-1','ezslot_19',191,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-mobile-leaderboard-1-0'); As a final test, specifically for the sake of this review, I recently shot a roll slightly overexposed to see how well I could correct it. I use ISO 400 film for people photos, since I'm snapping people in all sorts of unpredictable light, and need enough speed to stop action and prevent blur from motion. I cant remember if I commented or not, but I do remember thinking how much I was going to miss this film. Raising the exposure in post-production will ruin the look of the grain. You can use Kodak Vision 500T or 250D its improved Portra. CineStill 800T shot in daylight without a warming filter, scanned with no colour correction via PrimeFilm XAs. Pull - Halving the amount of light by -1, -2,-3 stops. Landscape photography, for example, is very well-suited to low . Has 90% of ice around Antarctica disappeared in less than a decade? So for the best possible image quality when shooting at night, keep the ISO as low as you can. I have heard things on the internet that they do harm your film; but in my experience I have never had any issues. What you see here are composite images made with both frames (with and without 85C filter) sliced and arranged next to each other for easy comparison. Cookie Notice Got another roll of it heading into the night? About Submissions Apps & Downloads Shop Terms Privacy Cookies Disclaimer AUP Privacy Tools Feedback Feedly Twitter Tumblr Mastodon Instagram Pinterest. A: 50Daylight is a ISO 50/18 speed daylight balanced (5500K) motion picture emulsion, prepped and rolled for clean safe C-41 standard development as an ISO 50 film. The first will be bigger problem with small format (you enlarge more, but 1/2000 and faster speeds are common) and the second with medium format (many MF cameras are limited to 1/500 sec). The filter will also darken the image, so you will need to meter at 400 on a handheld meter to compensate. Yes, it is. I use ISO 800 colour film to take pictures during my forest walks and with long lenses that I use handheld. A variable neutral density filter (or variable ND filter) can help fix that! The rest is done with your development lab. I typically prefer results taken with the filter, but its not difficult to imagine that certain photographs. Shooting c200 in my canon that defaults to 100 so i get seascapes overexposed by one stop)I have recently switched from P400 to P160 for my 135 landscapes for 1 reason .Grain. If you're looking for a film that you can reasonably use indoors without a flash, but which will also work outdoors in a pinch, go with ISO 400. "medium film". ISO 800, 1600. Some notable 800 ISO features include fine grain that really only comes out in low light photos, the ability to shoot in lighting of all kinds, and being able to up the shutter speed to . Analog.Cafe publishes weekly photo essays on art, travel, and culture; analogue cameras, film, history, and techniques. Your donations via Buy Me A Coffee and your purchases from our shop are very much appreciated. Answer (1 of 8): If it's a disposable camera, then it came loaded with that film by design. If you dont have an 85C warming filter, you may be able to colour correct your CineStill 800T frames shot in daylight that appear to have an undesired blue/teal overcast. This rating is also called speed. To shoot film well you should understand exactly how an image gets made, so the basics of exposure are a great place to start! As for who said 400 or(!) Thanks Aukje! I'm sure the camera's meter would indicate whether or not it's overexposed, but even if it doesn't, is that kind of film prone to being overexposed? rev2023.3.1.43269. This gives you the capability to shoot at lower shutter speeds if you want to play with some daytime motion blur, or wider apertures if you want some sweet bokeh. If underexposed, it will have more of a muddy and grainy look. Portra 400 is well known to be a film that allows for significant levels of overexposure and it still be quite correctable. And if you shoot it in daylight, a sunny day is 5400k and shade is 6500-7000k, meaning that shooting tungsten film in daylight will give you completely blue photos. There are, however, ways to control the colour cast that CineStill 800T produces when shot in daylight. As the others have noted, the quality of the pictures is not as good as with less sensitive films: more grain and less brilliant colors (for color films). Also, 400 is a good general purpose film. Medium speed film should generally not be used with fast motion photography such as sporting events, indoors without much lighting, or in extremely bright lighting. An artificial light scene, taken on daylight-balanced Lomochrome Metropolis film. To get the best skin tones and colors, you can do one of two things: Shoot it at 800 with an 85 B filter ( find on Amazon ). Kodak Portra 800 is quite possibly my favourite colour negative film. This is something I really like about Portra 400, but for one reason or another, I didnt expect Id get the same consistency from Porta 800, which is an older emulsion.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_10',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0');if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_11',184,'0','1'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0_1');.large-leaderboard-2-multi-184{border:none!important;display:block!important;float:none!important;line-height:0;margin-bottom:7px!important;margin-left:auto!important;margin-right:auto!important;margin-top:7px!important;max-width:100%!important;min-height:250px;padding:0;text-align:center!important}. Sometimes when you use the filter, the images turn out a little too warm, but it is very easy to correct with the . So if you have an ISO of 100, then the shutter speed should be 1/100 (or its closest conservative setting of 1/125s). CineStill 800T shot on Vitessa A. At this stage, it was quickly dawning on me that Portra 800 could be the film that might offer me the greatest level of versatility and the lowest level of requirement to tinker with the results within my workflow. Another is to shoot the film at 400-500 ISO. I found your results enlightening and certainly stimulating in the direction of trying some Portra 800.Whether in landscapes or portraits, I simply would not have taken these for having been shot on 800-speed film. Correct me if Im wrong (not unknown), but shooting an ISO 800 film at EI1200 is underexposing the film and not overexposing. Dont deviate from that unless you have a good reason. But the grain roughness also jumps substantially from ISO 400 to 800. We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. Instead, each film type has an ISO rating which relates to the light-sensitive emulsion layer on the film. Shoot that one at 6400 . Keep this in mind when shooting outdoors on a sunny day. Now I'm just trying to select types of film I like the look of to try in some cameras I have, in this case specifically for a balanced general purpose (let's say a mix of outdoors and sometimes in a shade or well-lit room). Kodak Tri-X 400. Of course I CAN/COULD use anything, as there's nothing keeping me from doing so. By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. Way back when we chatted about film choices for you, if Id known what I do now, and seen more of the sorts of shots of yours Ive seen since, I think I would have recommended this film. Understanding how to expose in lower-light and how to scan properly can reap much better results in my experience but anyway, thats a rant for another day. Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange! . And I have been really happy with the results, actually my best so far. I scanned the test roll with PrimeFilm XAs using the digital negative technique that ensured no unexpected automatic colour adjustments on top of the scanner data. Now, Im not a fan of shooting high contrast because in 2021 you want a good scan with detail then you put the contrast in yourself; but if you want to get stuff back from the lab that kids you you were shooting E6 but still looks nice, Ektar is the go. Go for one of the disposables above for non-aquatic photo fun. Light meter battery ran low and I overexposed my ASA 400 HP5+. Taking care of colour casts, in this case, can be done using. Film Type: Daylight Color Film; ISO: 800; Size: 35mm Color Film; See More Product Details. Yes, you can. Its really great to read about your experience with Portra 800 as Ive been using Portra 400 exclusively, rating it at 100 with results Ive been really happy with. Shooting CineStill 800T in daylight with and without 85C warming filter: an experiment. So I wanted to know if Portra 800 was just as flexible. shooting film is almost a Zen approach to photography. I'll have a look at ND-filters. Perhaps more faded blacks or some such thing? Holy blazing snotballs Batman I am totally in awe of this film/lens/camera combination.It is such a joy to see how fine, true to colour and forgiving a film can be.This one is going on my bucket list for sure.Thanks HamishTom. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. In 120 Ive stuck with P400 so far. The proprietary, advanced Dye Layering Technology (DLT) provides noticeably reduced grain in shadows, allowing you to pull out an amazing amount of shadow detail. In my experience, the filter required no exposure adjustments. If your camera's max shutter is limited to (say) 1/1000, and you have a lens with 1/22 minimum aperture, then you can basically only shoot f/22 @ 1/1000, and that's it. ISO controls the amount of light your camera lets in, and therefore how dark or light your photos will be. I have just bought a few rolls of the 800 though as I was looking for a little more versatility. You can adjust the stops of light that are let into your lens, depending on the environment. During the day, the film is perfect for capturing images in overcast or shady conditions, such as in the forests, metro systems, or back alleyways. I often create a new layer with pure white and pure black swatches of colour to help me quickly reference how those tones ought to look in the end. Has Microsoft lowered its Windows 11 eligibility criteria? It definitely says 200 though). To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. They put high(er) speed films . When shot in daylight, an 85B filter is recommended and shooting the film at 500 ISO Acceptable for push processing up to 3200 ISO Recommended to process C-41 or you can process in ECN-2 chemistry . Both "bright indoors" and "general outdoors". This has almost turned into a piece, hey. Some people say that 400 ISO is the "true" rating of the Alexa sensor but 800 ISO is the manufacturer's recommended rating. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. The difference in colour balance between shots taken with and without the filter depends on the time of day and the scene. When it's night time just switch that baby back to 800 because you'll likely need the extra stops of light. I mostly used shutter-priority with a time of 1/500s or 1/1000s. Get your work featured on this website, our mailing list, and social media. The biggest problem you will find with NDs, is that if you are using a reflex camera it will get very dark when looking trough the eyepiece and might be a bit harder to focus. These next shots were taken at EI200, and though this seemed to emphasise a yellowish-shift in the scans, it was nothing I couldnt post-process out with relative ease. ISO 200 is identical to setting to 800, overexposing 2 EV, and dropping two stops in post. Even still, I find that color is challenging for unstaged, non-deliberately lit work due to all the variables it . All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Or, you could shoot this film at 800 and get more leeway in terms of aperture/shutter range. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_7',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0');if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_8',185,'0','1'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0_1');.banner-1-multi-185{border:none!important;display:block!important;float:none!important;line-height:0;margin-bottom:7px!important;margin-left:auto!important;margin-right:auto!important;margin-top:7px!important;max-width:100%!important;min-height:250px;padding:0;text-align:center!important}, Importantly, at least as far as my workflow goes, I didnt find myself needing to correct colour-shifts much between frames, which to me was a good sign that Portra 800 could hold up to at least a bit of variance in exposure within my workflow without it causing me a headache in the scan and in post. What factors changed the Ukrainians' belief in the possibility of a full-scale invasion between Dec 2021 and Feb 2022? Ive also over and underexposed it a little bit, just to see how well it would respond. If you want the other benefits of 800T without losing warm, golden tones you find in daylight, try one of these filters out! It is my opinion that the tools should not determine the way you want to shoot, but the other way around. But remember, CineStill 800T is designed for C-41 processing, which causes a slight push in development and results in a denser negative. mode, I shifted my sliders away from Green towards Magenta, from Cyan towards Red, and from Blue towards Yellow. A difference of 1 in E V corresponds to 1 "stop" (+1 stop = 2 x . Torsion-free virtually free-by-cyclic groups. s 5800K. With very little work in post in fact just enough to get rid of the scanners tendency to a yellowish-orange cast I got results that were bang on how I like my colour film images to look. Color Balance adjustment layer in Photoshop is a great tool for fixing white balance issues and removing colour casts. Just thought Id say hi , but it turned in to a what Im shooting and why. (Im on holidays) BTW started a project Im pretty sure Ill shoot dig Im shooting it on dig and 120P400 but I think Im getting more what want off the dig. Proimage 100 is another film thats given me the more saturated colours I like, but as a 100 speed film, I just didnt find it to be as versatile as Id have liked. The other thing Id say reading this is, OK how did you end up getting on with E100? The rule states that on a sunny day, you should get correct exposure with camera settings of aperture f/16 and shutter speed as the inverse of the ISO (film speed). I have found zero advantage overexposing this film, in fact its just given me work work. //]]>. I love the softness I can get with Kodak Portra 800 shot indoors at low light. Kodak Portra 800 and Lomography 800 are about the only options I could find today. Id really like to see what you do with it looking back, I wish Id known about it sooner. Shooting under this subdued light can be tricky. The combination of shutter speed, aperture and film speed/ISO (and light modifiers) are expressed as EV or "Exposure Value". So I suppose I could try it and see how it responds for the scenes I like to use it in, as long as it's not overly bright. demonstrates how its grain behaves and illustrates the impressive 10+ stops of dynamic range: The proprietary Sub-Micron Technology [that] enables 2 stops of extended highlight latitude, so you can follow the action into bright light-in a single shot-without worrying about blown-out details. As it turns out it is at least fairly happy with overexposure. Earlier or later in the day, you may need to start shooting at ISO 400+. Got another roll of it heading into the night? Low-light settings will have a brighter image than the 100 film speed, but it will appear overexposed on a bright sunny day. Outside of circles: frame shot with no warming filter and no colour correction. For such high ISOs you probably want an with a density of 5 or 6 stops. B&W film should be less problematic. In short, your mileage may vary, but I hope that this at least gives a rough idea of the sort of results you can expect to achieve. You can speed up this process with the Curves adjustment layer that has image sampling pipettes (to the left of the histogram) which you can use to pick the white, grey, and black points in your photograph. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! that ensured no unexpected automatic colour adjustments on top of the scanner data. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Thanks. And Cinestill also sell a film for daylight shooting, naturally named Cinestill 50D (Daylight). As an 800 ISO film, I suppose I had pigeon-holed it as a low-light film. Very timely review as Ive just shot my first rolls of Portra 800 in 120 on my Mamiya 6 looking forwards to seeing the results! Note, it doesn't have the same color style as the other two. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. In most cases, a 400-speed film will allow you to get perfect exposures without a tripod. This remarkable emulsion is always in high demand, and its not just the hype: this film delivers for both perfectionists and experimental photographers. ISO is your camera's sensitivity to light as it pertains to either film or a digital sensor. Film Review: CineStill 50D VS. 800T . This is simply done by setting your metering to act as if its 1-2 stops higher than the 800 speed. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Can you shoot Cinestill 800 at 400? Most film has the latitude to handle a few stops of overexposure. You beat me to this! Mar 21 . Utilizing the cinematic VISION Film technology, this film's smooth grain profile pairs with a micro-structure optimized T-GRAIN emulsion to make it especially well-suited to scanning applications, and advanced development . How have you found the lomography stuff? CineStill 800T is a great alternative to the few options we have. All of the test shots were made with Vitessa A. As they are a light source they will be bright enough to use your film at box speed i.e ISO 800. [CDATA[ I like "being in the now . The Hexar, of course, has the advantage of a built in light meter that happens to suit me very well. I can also shoot it at night - but it does mean that at night, I'm going to need a tripod and some long shutter speeds. Im not really sure what made me decide to load a roll of it and shoot it in daylight originally, but Im really glad I did. Thanks to Cinestill 800Ts great exposure latitude, you can easily underexpose the film for photos that appear darker and sport more contrast. Using an ISO 100 film on that same day would give you the same exposure, less grain, and at the same time a much larger range of possible settings. After shooting both Portra 400 and Portra 800, I will say that it is much easier to shoot . So adding heavy NDs will not affect the color of the images. You won't miss a low light shot again . Improve this answer. Higher ISO films like ISO 400 are meant for everyday handheld shooting in daylight. There's a reason that Ektar has 'the world's finest grain' while a couple of the shots here on this 1600 ISO . Interestingly, an overcast days sunlight measures nearly 7000K, just like an LED or a blue star. "fast film". Tonight I'm going to a little get together indoors and wanted to try it out. The purpose would be mixed scenes. Prior to shooting Portra 800, my biggest concern or sense of limitation with regard to this film was its higher speed. Could be. When you are unable or unwilling to close your aperture too much (due to desired depth of field and/or diffraction worries) you have to resort to ND filters to make exposure work. Obviously grain is not ideal but it is also not my primary concern, at least at this point in my analog journey. I think it is the best. . But most of the time, photography isn't just about recording an image -- the goal is to record the best image you can. This just tricks the meter into over exposing the film. Using ISO 1600 film outdoors, you're paying more money to get less resolution. Which prompted me to ask "Well, if that's intended for really low light, is it AT ALL usable outdoors or will I run into problems with overexposure even attempting to use it?". Fast speed film will result in the grainiest photographs but is great to use when shooting fast-moving subjects in low light conditions. Not good or bad, but less, so if I want to print at 900mm on the short edge the grain is nice, whereas 400 is getting a bit chunky at that size. How far can you push process an accidentally under-exposed film? It's also a versatile film and can be used indoors and outdoors, but preferably in lots of light. Best Overall: Kodak Funsaver Disposable Camera ISO-800 at Amazon. Try rating around ISO 200 for beautiful colors and skin tones. Is there a more recent similar source? Prior to shooting Portra 800, my biggest concern or sense of limitation with regard to this film was its higher speed.